No i refuse. i return the ticket of your so called avant garde. I will accept all previous understanding and thus say it is not outright wrong but instead respond it is incomplete. Thus my art will not undermine my past but seek to build off of it. to see beyond. continuously.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Clement Greenberg
Greenberg's obsession with the avante garde is fatalistic and the reason we have such deconstructionist art. Certainly good ideas are ahead of their time. I am saying that the means to that end is wrong because he seeks to show that artist who undermine the system are the finest artist. where in truth undermining it to reveal weakness and disavow all previous understanding is preposterous. Men and Women always will have a hard time letting go. And it is cynical to believe that we must make art that they won't get and that can be a good thing. the atvant garde is too destructive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(287)
-
▼
February
(41)
- answer me
- If Ever there was a universal truth
- That's Awful
- Kitsch
- To My Unborn Daughter.
- Circumvention.
- Myah Answer
- The Fundamental Element of Being Human
- Is This Weird?
- This Goes For Everyone
- Things I find Important
- Call me paranoid
- I am Keeping this Forever and Ever
- Yeah I did it
- The Meaning of Life: an Ontology and Teleology
- Saw Him's at he MCA
- Philosophy and Illusion
- Music Like Painting
- My Brain has literally exploded.
- What Is Right?
- The problem with Populism.
- The problem with Meritocracy
- Oedipus
- Oh The Banality
- An Addendum To Berthold
- A Day About Berthold
- Subject Mattered
- Stole this Dopeness from Alice Quinlan
- What Happens
- Self-Critical
- Has the Photograph Killed the Drawing
- Dear Father
- Clement Greenberg
- Concerns
- Things I Do No Believe In
- Twas a High Night Last Night.
- Who Do we Live our lives for?
- What I Would Save.
- Defined
- accepting stupid people
- Time
-
▼
February
(41)

No comments:
Post a Comment