Friday, October 16, 2009
The dichotomy of painting
If the two arts originally accepted as respectable are music and poetry. And We see music as pure emotion in vivid sound that in such a way music can illustrate or depict nothing except transient feeling. While poetry is a narrative in some sense that uses words with establish definitions to illustrate its points and poetry is everlasting immutable to time. Then Painting is the bridge between them. At times in Egyptian and Romanesque periods becoming as poetry used to illustrate a scene and sequence. At other times Like Rothko's minimalism establishing only feeling through color and no scene and absence of narrative as exactly like music. Then painting is what bridges music and Poetry and truly deserves to be an art.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(221)
-
▼
October
(37)
- Grrr
- Vedran Smajlović
- What i do have
- Theory part a Zillion
- Bleary Eyes
- Beethoven Symphony #3
- In love as In war
- moderation
- Fuck Being A Pussy I have to Commit
- Ars Poetica
- Mary Elizabeth Fyre
- The Musicians have it right
- My Rhyme for Keziah
- Titian and Michelangelo
- Soviet
- Oh Man Salvador Dali
- epiphenomenon
- Native American Name
- The dichotomy of painting
- worship
- Neither Callicles/Nietzsche nor Socrates is right....
- Leaders of Men Come From?
- What I Want to See
- The Painter
- Bach Cello Suite 1
- Facture
- I am only as good as you want it
- Ross is Playing guitar
- Dear Science
- The most Perfect wish.
- Hodler and Richie
- Do I Participate in my life?
- Dear Friends Family and All others
- New Plan
- What am I willing to Sacrifice for Art
- i want
- Is Pitchfork Trying to Justify itself
-
▼
October
(37)

No comments:
Post a Comment